翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Immigration and crime ・ Immigration and Intergenerational Mobility in Metropolitan Los Angeles ・ Immigration and Nationality ・ Immigration and Nationality Act ・ Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 ・ Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 ・ Immigration and Nationality Act Section 287(g) ・ Immigration and Nationality Directorate ・ Immigration and Nationality Law Review ・ Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act ・ Immigration and Naturalisation Service (Netherlands) ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Abudu ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-Aguirre ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Doherty ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Stevic ・ Immigration and Protection Tribunal ・ Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada ・ Immigration and Refugee Protection Act ・ Immigration Appellate Authority ・ Immigration Bridge ・ Immigration by country ・ Immigration consultant ・ Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council ・ Immigration Control Platform Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha ： ウィキペディア英語版 Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha ''Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha'', 462 U.S. 919 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case ruling in 1983 that the one-house legislative veto violated the constitutional separation of powers. ==Parties== *Original Defendant/Current Petitioner: The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and the U.S. Attorney General. While the INS and Attorney General were nominally the original defendant and current petitioner, they argued in favor of Chadha's position challenging the relevant provision's constitutionality. *Original Plaintiff/Current Respondent: Jagdish Chadha, a foreign exchange student considered a citizen neither by Kenya nor by India, who brought suit challenging the House Resolution ordering his deportation. *Amici curiae: The U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, which argued in support of the relevant provision's constitutionality. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.